The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships

Wednesday 4th of September 2024
Legal Studies

Syllabus Topic


Option 3: Family

 

Contemporary issues concerning family law

  • recognition of same-sex relationships



INTRODUCTION

The recognition of same-sex relationships has emerged as a significant and evolving issue in contemporary family law. As societal views on relationships and family structures have shifted, legal systems worldwide, including Australia's, have been challenged to adapt and provide equal rights and protections to all couples, regardless of gender. The journey towards legal recognition of same-sex relationships reflects broader debates about equality, justice, and the role of law in shaping social norms. This article explores the development of legal frameworks for recognizing same-sex relationships, examining key legislative changes, court decisions, and ongoing challenges within the context of family law.

 

THE NEED TO RECOGNISE SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS

Same-sex relationships operate similarly to heterosexual relationships in terms of the mutual duty of care between partners and the shared responsibilities for managing finances, property, and future plans, all within a typical familial and domestic structure. Because of these similarities, it's crucial to ensure that same-sex couples have equal access to legal rights and protections, including those related to property, insurance, child custody, health services, and bereavement. Given the history of discrimination against same-sex couples, often rooted in complex socio-political factors, family law aims to eliminate any form of bias that could arise from discriminatory loopholes within legal, social, and political institutions.

 

LEGAL RESPONSES - CASES

  • Hope & Brown v NIB Health Fund [1995] EOC- this case’s issue revolved around inability of a same-sex couple to attain a health fund as a couple and family, and set equitable precedent for same-sex couples.

 

  • Andrews v Howard [1999] NSWCA – the case concerned issue of “next of kin” for same-sex couple after one partner passed away, and although the plaintiff in the case succeeded, he received much less than a heterosexual partner would have inherited without a trial.

 

LEGAL RESPONSES - LEGISLATION

  • Marriage Act 1961 (Cth)- the definition of marriage was in contention as to whether it meant a marriage between a man and woman or just two individuals in general.
  • Marriage Amendment Act 2004 (Cth) - politically motivated bill passed by the Howard Government to ensure marriage definition was defined to be between man and woman exclusively.

 

NON-LEGAL RESPONSES

 

 


SOURCES


Australian Government: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission 1997 Report

Jade Bar.net: ANDREWS v HOWARD [1999] NSWCA 409

NSW Legislation Register: Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999 No 4

NSW Legislation Register: Miscellaneous Acts Amendment (Relationships) Act 2002 No 73

AUSTLII: Marriage Act 1961 (Cth)

Parliament of Australia: Marriage Amendment Bill 2004

ACT Legislation Register: Marriage Equality (Same Sex) Act 2013

Parliament of Australia: Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017

Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, 2017

 Yes Campaign Website: Yes Campaign

 SBS: Gay Marriage